Measuring Quality of Care

Quality of care can be determined by assessing structures, processes and outcomes of care.

The IPCOR study will collect data and report on the following clinical indicators to assess quality of care.

Quality indicators table

Quality dimension and indicators selected; Indicator type Rationale for choosing the indicator
Safe, effective and patient-centred care
Percentage of men demonstrating treatment failure at time points 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months Outcome It is important to identify those men who do not appear to be responding to prostate cancer treatment regimens.
Patient assessment of physical health at 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post diagnosis Outcome It is important to identify men who are demonstrating clinical signs of disability so that interventions may be considered to improve quality of life.
Patient assessment of mental health at 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post diagnosis Outcome It is important to identify men who are demonstrating clinical signs of disability so that interventions may be considered to improve quality of life.
Percent positive margins following prostatectomy for T2 and T3 disease Outcome The presence of positive surgical margins following prostatectomy has been positively and independently associated with disease progression, even after accounting for stage of disease. Surgical experience and technique has been shown to impact on margin rates.
Percentage of men with PSA level recorded post prostatectomy Process PSA levels for all men with prostate cancer who are having radical treatment should be checked at the earliest 6 weeks following treatment, at least every 6 months for the first 2 years and then at least once a year thereafter.
Volume (number) of patients treated (by type of treatment - surgery, radiotx, surveillance) at each site Structure There is evidence that quality of care is impacted on by volume of patients treated.
PSA level at 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months Outcome Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level is a well regarded prognostic marker for progressive disease.
Percentage of men with clear documentation of clinical TNM stage Process Documentation of clinical TNM provides evidence that a physical assessment has been undertaken in the assessment of patient risk and disease progression.
Percentage of men who complete patient assessment of urinary, sexual and bowel functioning at 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post diagnosis for men who have undergone prostatectomy or radiation therapy or surveillance(PROM data) Outcome Patient assessment of complications may assess underlying quality of care issues at clinician or institution level.
Appropriate care
Percentage of men with low, intermediate or high grade disease who receive adjuvant hormonal therapy post radical radiotherapy (d’Amico) Process Adjuvant hormonal therapy is recommended for a minimum of 2 years in men receiving radical radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer who have a Gleason score of = 8.
Percentage of men with low, intermediate or high grade disease who were given brachytherapy (d’Amico) Process Brachytherapy is NOT recommended for men with advanced prostate disease.
Percentage of men with low, intermediate or high grade disease who were managed with active surveillance (d’Amico) Process Active surveillance is NOT recommended for men with advanced prostate disease.
Percentage of men over 75 years of age who received treatment for their prostate cancer Process Older men may be undertreated for prostate cancer
Timeliness/ Equity/Access to care
Time from diagnosis (diagnostic biopsy) to initial treatment Outcome Delay in treatment may reflect organisational management or access to treatment.
Distance from place of residence to treatment centre Outcome Distance to treatment, in part, reflects access and equity of care. Treatment decisions may be impacted on by burden of access/travel.
Time form GP referral to biopsy Access Delay in assessment may reflect organisational management or access to care.
Time from diagnosis to MRI scan Resources Access to MRI imaging in prostate cancer diagnosis, staging and decision making is vital.
Numbers undergoing each treatment at each Treatment centre Access Patients should be allowed access to the full range of treatments in each centre
Irish Prostate Cancer Outcomes Research - About Ipcor

About IPCOR

Background

The Irish Prostate Cancer Outcomes Research is establishing a nationwide prostate cancer registry which captures high-quality information from newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients in the Republic of Ireland.

Read More
Irish Prostate Cancer Outcomes Research - About Ipcor

Our Goals

Aims

Our main objective is to collect detailed clinical and quality of life data on Irish men’s prostate cancer journey to better inform future care delivery, knowledge of the disease and best use of health care innovations and resources.

Read More